Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:15

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What is your best gay fantasy?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How can I promote my Amazon products to get more sales?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Toyota Industries' shares nosedive on $33 billion buyout deal — steepest fall in 10 months - CNBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Roberts: Chance Of Ohtani Pitching Before All-Star Break Is "North Of Zero" - MLB Trade Rumors
Thank you.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Don't Like The New Xbox Game Hubs? Here's How To Turn Them Off - Pure Xbox
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: